My initial take:
I've been with plasma since the PV70 and have had units that encompass the 2007 era up to the V20.
My observation/s:
1)Image retention will always be a part of the plasma experience, the same way that screen uniformity and the lack thereof of LCD is a part of the LCD experience.
-All my plasma units have had I.R, there was no way for me to avoid it.
-I've had one plasma that I did a "measure" (not as strict as the experiment) of break in and it was the PV80, however, it still induced image retention after just 2 hours of gaming. Of course, the image washed away, but it was not as quick as I hoped it would be. Will performing a more thorough break-in prevent that? There is no way for me to know unless, I can get a brand new PV80.
2)Some plasma models are a bit tougher on the I.R side, as they seem to take in more images without coughing up a retention immediately. This was the C10, and do note: I used the C10 out of the box without any form of "break-in".
I'm glad ,Vic of Sights and Sounds, delivered a brand new V20, I can use as a stage point. My 1st V20 did not go thru a break-in. This second one will go thru a very strict break-in and from there...I'll see if:
-It will be more resistant to "I.R" than the 1st one. Because, if there is no change at all, and the image retention resiliency is just as like the 1st one I had, then it will be very hard for me to recommend a "break-in". At Least for this model.
For the record: I don't beleive plasma is already bullet proff when it comes to permanent burn-in. Sure, it will really take a tremendous, and almost deliberate act of wanton descruction to induce the permanent scar (which I know most of you guys will not perform) but I've seen a 2008 plasma that is already burnt with pc game images.
We'll check back after the test.